| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

not blissful

Page history last edited by Kaisiris Tallini 2 years ago

 

Today the born again Jesus is not blissful


As Martin Luther put it before Nicolaus Copernicus (19.02.1473 – 24.05.1543) published his De revolutionibus orbium coelestium, which eventually led to the Copernican, or Scientific revolution (circa 03.1543 – 29.12.2020), and in describing both non-Aristotelian astronomy, and the author of such "foolishness":

 

"People gave ear to an upstart astrologer who strove to show that the earth revolves, not the heavens or the firmament, the sun and the moon ... This fool wishes to reverse the entire [Aristotelian] science of astronomy; but sacred Scripture tells us that Joshua commanded the sun to stand still, and not the earth [Joshua 10:13]."

 

By the way, nobody called Martin Luther an 'upstart Augustine monk' when he started what Cesidians now call Pauline Christianity (31.10.1517 – 11.02.1858), and he attacked another bastion of Aristotelian Christianity when he challenged the Catholic church, and especially papal authority, with the publication of his Ninety-five Theses in 1517.

 

In fact, not even Pope Leo X called him a "fool" in 1521. He just excommunicated him. If Luther made any income through the Catholic church, Luther was just taken off the payroll.

 

The rest, of course, is "history", which is still an Aristotelian social science even today, by the way. Protestants have been able to do quite well without the support of Catholics ever since. Believe it or not, they still had the support of rulers or kings, which still practice Aristotelian political science to this very day.

 

Also note that despite Luther's comments and scepticism, "upstart astrologers" actually started being called 'astronomers', sometime after the publishing of De revolutionibus, and now they are doing quite well even without astrology side gigs.

 

Note that even though Sir Isaac Newton (25.12.1642 – 20.03.1726) was still a believer in astrology and its value, today he is known as an English mathematician, physicist, astronomer, alchemist, theologian, and author.

 

Alchemists are no longer hired through Monster.com, and Newton was described in his times by most folks as a "natural philosopher", another occupation today that you can't even have side gigs with.

 

What about "natural scientist", someone opposed to all that Aristotelian science even among the more rigourous sciences?

 

Would you be able to live with an Aristotelian astronomy, with the belief that the Sun and other celestial bodies revolve around the Earth?

 

Of course you could. Even today.

 

Martin Luther did just fine. He's even in the Aristotelian history books.

 

Was Newton condemned for continuing to entertain his astrological 'heresies', at least in private?

 

No. He also did just fine, and is even in the Aristotelian history books.

 

However, only a Cesidian spiritual scientist like myself believes, and can actually prove, the scientific validity of multiple incarnations, also known as a religious concept as reincarnation.

 

Even Jesus believed in reincarnation or gilgul neshamot [גִּלְגּוּל נְשָׁמוֹת], and it's even obvious, since John the Baptist was the born again Elijah for Jesus himself (Matthew 11:14–15).

 

However, Aristotelian Christians, which are both Catholic and Protestants today, deliberately ignore these things.

 

In reality, demographics is the key to understanding, even proving, that each of us have not only lived several lives, several incarnations as a human being — about 15 incarnations on average —, but demographics is also the key to understanding just how many more lives the most reincarnated, and currently still extant (still living) human beings have lived — about 15 times 15, or 225 incarnations, if one goes back to at least 8000 BCE.

 

Because of this, even though I'm not an Israeli, or even a Jew today, I can affirm that I was an ancient Israelite!

 

Strictly speaking, an Israeli is only defined by the Aristotelian government of Israel, while an Israelite is a member of the Hebrew people who inhabited the ancient kingdom of Israel, and no living Israeli, or even religious Jew, can make the claim that he was also an Israelite factually, unless he can show evidence that he lived in the ancient kingdom of Israel through gilgul neshamot or reincarnation. That evidence has begun to accumulate, by the way.

 

I was able to identify at least 13 previous incarnations of mine as a male, and even one incarnation as a female, although I have almost no information about that incarnation. I did this through both a very strong power of observation, through serendipity, a few very lucid dreams, and even through the clever use of maths and historical data.

 

I'm also aware of things like this. Even though Isaac Newton did just fine in that lifetime, I can tell you that I probably was able to "detect" the born again Isaac Newton in contemporary times, and although he is probably doing well as an engineer, author, and lecturer, if he is still alive, and not retired, he is not very popular with current physicists or cosmologists; is considered a maverick among those professionals and/or academics; and was basically prevented from communicating his ideas.

 

I'm also aware of the born again Albert Einstein (14.03.1879 – 18.04.1955), the born again William Shakespeare (26.04.1564 – 23.04.1616), and the born again Dante Alighieri (circa 1265 – 14.09.1321) with almost equal certainty, and I'm even more certain of other still living souls.

 

Examples:

 

  • Levi or Matthew bar Halphai/Chalpai

  • James bar Halphai/Chalpai or James the Less

  • Nathanael bar Talmai [circa 5 CE – 24.08.62 CE] (aka Bartholomew)

  • Philip (of Bethsaida) [circa 3 CE – 90 CE]

  • Christina (1626 – 1689), Queen of Sweden (1632 – 1654)

  • Abraham (2048 BCE – 1873 BCE)

  • John bar Zebedee, or John the Evangelist (also Nostradamus in another incarnation)

  • Judas bar Simon "Iscariot"

  • Paul or Saul of Tarsus (?10 CE – 65/67 CE)

  • Saint Stephen [5 CE – 36 CE] (Acts 6–7)

  • John the Baptist (5 BCE – 26 CE) (also John Nelson Darby in another incarnation)

  • Simon bar Jonah, aka «Cephas» or Peter

  • Andrew bar Jonah [circa 5 CE – 30.11.69 CE]

  • James bar Zebedee or James the Great

  • Jude Thomas or «Didymos» (also Francis I of France in another incarnation)

  • Simon Zelotes/Kananaios

  • Jude bar Jacob Thaddaeus or Lebbaeus

  • Mary the Magdalene

 

Can you live without these incredible insights, without this extraordinary consciousness?

 

Yes, and life would be a lot easier!

 

Ignorance is bliss!

 

Can you live without fiat money (the current US dollars), and/or the 1944–1971 gold-backed dollars (then a gold standard)?

 

You could in theory, but you would need to live in a real natural society or koinonia (κοινωνία) [Strong's G2842], which is a Bible-based word Aristotelian Christians never use, just like the word Aristotelian Christians use all the time, or ekklesia (ἐκκλησία) [Strong's G1577], but I wasn't fully able to establish a natural society or koinonia so far, so it may take God's, Yehovah's direct intervention for me to leave all kinds of Aristotelian things, including all the pseudo-social sciences like Aristotelian economics behind.

 

It wasn't just Aristotle's physics and cosmology that was in error, and I believe Aristotelian Christianity, also known simply as Christianity (circa 08.04.30 CE – 03.02.2021), should also be sent to the dunghill.

 

Both fiat and backed currencies are Aristotelian, by the way, and Cesidian analytic theology (Cat), a new discipline that I founded which is like a multi-versatile and multidisciplinary calculus, shows that a "paradisaical currency", which since 17 March 2022 I'm seriously inclined to call an 'ectocurrency', would actually be a strange kind of fiat currency, because backed by nothing more than the faith and kindness of people part of single natural society. It would be a spiritual currency, in other words.

 

Aristotelian Christians call that single natural society the kingdom of God or Heaven, but it really isn't a kingdom, because the one behind it doesn't have a crown on his head.

 

You see, in the case of the Messiah, it is more like his head, is actually his crown: "You say I am a king. Actually, I was born and came into the world to testify to the truth. All who love the truth recogni[s]e that what I say is true." (John 18:37).

 

MT Kaisiris Tallini

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.