Rigourously proven: ectopolitans are gods

That ectopolitans are gods had been proven in a Cesidian societal-political science (Csps) kind of way, but I also found lots of real world Neocartesian biological science (Nbs) evidence re-affirming this theory.

I also managed to prove that ectopolitans are gods in a more comprehensive way, through the new calculus called Cesidian analytic theology (Cat), but I also proved it in a Cesidian spiritual science (Css) kind of way.

Now through Pythagorean ectolinguistics (Pel), am able to say that not only there is a lot of multidisciplinary evidence backing the thesis that ectopolitans are gods, but Pel has sort of become the ultimate 'smoking gun', and so it is not only very likely that ectopolitans are gods, but it is now practically certain, as certain as the Pythagorean Theorem is certain.

Pythagorean ectolinguistics (Pel), which is very different from Aristotelian linguistics (Al), has now conclusively proven that ectopolitans are gods. You can show this article to any person who thinks they "know" what a god is!

According to the Wolfram|Alpha computational knowledge and answer engine (this is not a search engine like Google or Microsoft Bing), 世界人 in Mandarin Chinese means 'cosmopolitan'.

The Chinese hanzi or logograms show that 世界人 means 世界 plus 人, or literally 'world people'.

However, the 世 hanzi alone also means world, so I dug further, and found out that the 界 hanzi means bound (or boundary), so 世界 means literally 'world bound', or 'world bounded', to be a little more precise.

However, an ectopolitan is an unbounded person, and that, in Chinese hanzi, and even in Japanese kanji, is 无界人.

So 无界人 means 'unbounded person' in Japanese in Google Translate, or basically 'ectopolitan' in English, and 世界人 means 'world people' in Japanese in Google Translate, or basically 'cosmopolitan' in English.

When I went to translate the two Japanese words 无界人 and 世界人 in Bing Microsoft Translator, however, I got a shocking surprise, because it translated the words as 'a master' and 'cosmopolitan' respectively.

So you see, it took probably several great linguists from Wolfram|Alpha, Google, and Bing Microsoft; it took a lot of ultramodern software developed by these companies, and a lot computing power through my old Dell Latitude 13 laptop, at least compared to the computing power of an "ancient" TRS-80 Model 100; but now you should know, and you should know in any language, especially in any ectolanguage, that an ectopolitan is a master, a 'god' with a lowercase letter 'G' — not quite an 'exopolitan', or an 'outside of the Solar System'-dwelling being yet.

You should also know, with almost equal certainty, that a cosmopolitan is, on the other hand, a 'bounded person', or an 'Earth-bounded person' to be a little more precise, so he is truly a self-made zoon politikon (ζῷον πoλιτικόν), as Aristotle would have put it, or a political animal.

Yes, he or she is a self-made zoon politikon, and he wasn't really made a political animal by anyone else, especially if he or she is a purported "Christian", because Jesus the Nazorean (October 5 BCE – April 30 CE), or Yeshua HaNotzri [יֵשׁוּעַ הַנָּצְרִי], would have wanted them to be different from zoa politika (ζῷα πολιτικά) [plural of zoon politikon], different, set apart from the political animals.

The entire New Testament shows this to be the case, so it definitely isn't just a single verse of the Bible. As decent theologians have reasoned, the demons called Jesus the son of God (Matthew 8:29; Luke 4:41; Mark 3:11).

The charge against Jesus, was that he claimed to be the son of God (Matthew 27:43; John 19:7), a claim Jesus never denied, and virtually admitted (Luke 22:70).

Moreover, in John 10:36 Jesus emphatically stated that he was the one who the Father set apart from everyone else [consecrated], and sent into the world.

So it is therefore clear that Jesus wanted purported "Christians" to be different from all the zoa politika, and you can't be different unless you deliberately decide to take up the challenge. You can only blame yourself, if you are a senior, or even a bright junior adult.

A son of God, a son of Yehovah [יְהֹוָה] or Jehovah, simply cannot be a political animal, because sons, or daughters, are not anyone else's pet legally-speaking, and they certainly cannot rationally be God's pet!

I have thus proven that the de jure or legal ectopolitan by the name of Kaisiris Tallini is right, and that Diogenes of Sinope (circa 412 – 323 BCE) was wrong, and still a Greek, despite all his efforts to be a cosmopolitan — he even lived in a wine barrel in pursuit of this spiritual quest, not in a regular Greek home —, so he was just an odd Greek fellow, although a Greek fellow you can definitely admire, unlike most Christians!

A citizen of the world, or a cosmopolitan, is still part of the granular political system of circa 200 zoos at least indirectly, although he may stray a little from his native zoo from time to time, while an ectopolitan, especially a de jure or legal ectopolitan, is not part of the political system at all, for he or she is a god, that is a non-zoological, a wild or feral being.

It is like comparing a domestic (or house) cat kitten, to a bobcat kitten.

The article below shows that they can look similar as kittens, but even as kittens, or as baby cats, bobcats and house cats sound and behave very differently:

Found San Antonio kittens turn out to be baby bobcats

https://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local/article/Found-San-Antonio-kittens-turn-out-to-be-baby-12898573.php

In fact, even totally feral domestic cats sound and behave very differently, as I've shown through this article in the past:

Sociobiological differences between cosmopolitans and ectopolitans

http://5wcwiki.pbworks.com/.../cosmopolitans%20vs%20ectopolitans

It should also be noted that a particular bobcat hybrid DNA has been proven and documented at the Veterinary Genetics Laboratory School of Veterinary Medicine, of the University of California at Davis.

A bobcat female was bred with a domestic ocicat/bengal male.

She birthed hybrid felines, and the author of the web page below was fortunate to adopt this line of the rarest of hybrids, or the bobcat hybrid:

http://www.f1bobcat.com/about.html

So yes, ectopolitan humans can have children with cosmopolitan, or nearly ectopolitan humans!

However, just like bobcats need to be outside, so they're hearing the sounds of nature all of the time, ectopolitans don't get along with most zoa politika (ζῷα πολιτικά), especially politicians!

By the way, it should also be said that unlike bobcats, ectopolitans are not very dangerous at all, and in fact they are probably much less dangerous than most humans, even less dangerous to other domestic or wild animals in your neck of the woods.

However, ectopolitans are still very different if not genetically, then at least spiritually, and this is also why they need to live in their own real natural societies or koinonies (κοινωνίες), not zoos for human beings, ie juridical-only societies or poleis (πόλεις).

MT Kaisiris Tallini